Although I wouldn’t say that Monteith died directly because of INSITE, I would  say he met his demise because of the ideology that promotes the idea  that poisons can be ingested in a supposedly ‘safe’ manner.  It’s poison regardless if a nurse is watching or not!  This pro-drug stance  Vancouver has taken promotes harm, as the drugs taken by Monteith (and  yes being sold on the very doorstep of the SIS), were done so with an  illusion of a reduced likelihood of harm or even death.   Just ask the  beat cops (and even some of the SIS staff who are fearful of speaking)  about the dealers working in front of the SIS. 

 

But who wants to speak up when people like Ms. Corbella, who merely offer opposing views, are threatened?

 

There is all this talk about curtailing drug-related diseases and overdose  deaths through needle exchanges and drug injection sites as a harm  reduction measure.  Abstinence is the ultimate harm reduction measure:  harm reduction without a treatment modality attached to it is a wasted  effort.  The SIS studies are highly suspect as pointed out by Berner’s  Op Ed article below. These ‘studies’ are scientism at its best as  the researchers are all big advocates of the site who have been getting  millions of dollars to promote the Harm Reduction message.  Doesn’t  anyone who funds these guys and The Lancet who publishes their studies  see this obvious bias? 

 

Coerced treatment is just as effective as voluntary treatment, but that would  mean that we would have to be judgmental about their drug usage (not who they are as people)…and such judgments attack the core of this growth factor of the junkie industry. It is false compassion indeed. Addicts  need the cure, not the poison; the secret to beating addiction is hard  work through decent treatment. Drug addiction is all about the loss of  human potential and to give them boxes of needles in lieu of treatment  is shameful. The rich get treatment and the poor get Harm Reduction.

 

What is really needed are solid drug prevention measures and decent  long-term treatment…and it’s hard work to be sure, but these efforts  would far better resolve all of these problems. What addicts WANT are free needles, lots of drugs, and a place to shoot up because they are “not ready to quit”. What they NEED is treatment. Bleeding hearts (and legalizers) pander to the lowest  common denominator and facilitate drug use to make them feel  compassionate (and further their cause). The Vancouver experience has  been a dismal failure with hundreds dead and very high rates of disease- and look at the amputees hobbling around down there now! Coerced  treatment works as well as voluntary treatment and I see no  government-sponsored treatment centers as sweet and sexy as our drug  injection site. It’s hard to find treatment in the shadow of Harm  Reduction (watch part 5/7 of this video clip- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mE_Bz6rpia4 (@ 7 minute mark) for some real ‘insight’ into this mess).

 

“Adams said the staff screen clients and are ‘very astute as to who is a first-time user and who is not.’ ”

 

Watch this ‘Streets of Plenty’ clip to show what an utter lie this statement  is.  Addicts are so drug-addled as to be unable to see that there is  hope for salvaging their human potential- what is the excuse for the  blindness shown by those in the ‘junkie industry’ (besides making a  living off the backs of these poor unfortunates so desperately needing  help)?

 

We owe it to addicts to be judgmental, not about WHO they are as people  rather, about HOW their drug-related behaviour is costing themselves,  their families and society at large. To do anything else lacks  compassion and moral fiber.

 

Al Arsenault

Board Member,

Drug Prevention Network of Canada